You are absolutely right. There is a vast difference between men and women in that regard, and that, as you said, doesn’t mean that all men are prone to become mass shooters. It means that there’s a problem with men, men in America, men in general, how we educate men, how we treat men, I’m not sure. One of those, for sure. There is a problem. The problem is more than just being violent or prone to rage. The problem lies in the belief that one could (and even should) commit such a drastic, horrific act. This is something that women are naturally taught to avoid. We silence—ourselves and others. We never annihilate. It’s not in our nature, in our education, or in our environment as women. This is something important to look into. You’re right.
The problem is man-hating feminists like you, that look to blame men for all the ills of the world. Have you spoken up about the female teachers that rape young boys in their classes? I doubt it. Then there are female serial muderers like Dorothea Puente.
Of course you will ignore the fact that this mass shooter belongs to two dangerous demographics at the same time: transsexuals and radical leftists. Then there is the fact that Democrats enable those two demographics. But feminists like you prefer to ignore reality and just blame men.
There are a growing number of women that respect and value men, and speak up about male issues. Those women are always happily coupled. Feminists will grow old alone,
Couldn't even be bothered to finish your reply there, I see. Less of a mic drop, more of a mic whimper. It happens to everyone, don't worry.
Let's respond to you as if you're not full of shit (but we both know you are):
1. Trans mass shooters are statistical artifacts, not a demographic issue. There’s been only one confirmed trans case of a mass shooter in over six decades of data. That’s not a pattern, that’s a fluke. More robust stats put trans-perpetrator numbers at well under 1% of mass shootings. So you’re either lying, deliberately misreading, or panicking before you read.
2. As for radical leftists being the main mass shooter crew? All the extremist-linked killings in 2022 were far right. Not radical left. And mainstream media agrees: when ideology is in the mix, it’s virtually always the far right calling the shots. But congratulations, you managed to invent a rallying cry out of thin air. Does it hold water? No. But hey, it’s a cry.
3. You assumed facts about me I never even hinted at. I never said I was feminist, leftist, or radical. I don’t owe you my politics. Mass shooters assume facts about their targets too. Maybe you’re more alike than you think.
4. Your what-aboutism doesn't even touch the point, and I know you already know that, because it’s one of the most desperate tools one could use to try and change the subject. You saw that I said there’s a systemic problem and the word “men” and made so many assumptions, that you actually found a way to justify what I said. Ha.
So thanks, Joseph. You’ve managed to prove my point while also proving Phyllis right. A real feminist if I've ever seen one. ✊
While some high-profile shootings have involved individuals identifying as transgender, the vast majority of such crimes are committed by people who are not. All are mentally ill.
We are not debating shooting but also the large percentage of transgender who should be properly identified as mentally ill.
The more significant factor to examine is not gender identity but the prevalence of mental illness in American society. Conditions such as gender dysphoria, the correct name for transgender, is often associated with heightened psychological distress and other personality disorders which can contribute to instability, but they are just part of a wider crisis of untreated mental health issues.
Removing the transgender debate from the conversation allows us to focus more directly on the broader problem: the lack of adequate recognition, treatment, and support for serious mental illness.
It is wrong to pump individuals full of hormones to facilitate their delusional identities and this exacerbates a crisis rather than pacifies it.
What's sad is the prevalence of man-hating feminists that blame everything on men, despite the fact that this shooter was both a violent transsexual and a violent leftist radical.
Which is why men have walked away from feminists and feminist-leaning women.
The shooter was a man who think he is a woman and for the umpteenth time, there is a difference between hating men and hating male violence. If you can't tell the difference, it's a good thing that you have walked away from women.
What about the accompanying hormones being allowed for adolescents who think they (or their parents think they)want to be something other than what they were born as?? Adding extra dynamite 🧨 to the time bomb!
I’m really glad I won’t be living in their adult world . . Really glad!
I find male mass killers want to make a huge statement and inflict maximum, public misery. The rare female mass killer making her statement in the Tennessee school murders was a one-off. Some women and men will kill for greed, passion, revenge, or in the case of child killers (including parental child killers) they are sociopaths that enjoy hurting others. The increasing numbers of school children taking psychiatric meds is a time bomb.
So far I don't see that anything you are writing is even remotely controversial.
You are absolutely right. There is a vast difference between men and women in that regard, and that, as you said, doesn’t mean that all men are prone to become mass shooters. It means that there’s a problem with men, men in America, men in general, how we educate men, how we treat men, I’m not sure. One of those, for sure. There is a problem. The problem is more than just being violent or prone to rage. The problem lies in the belief that one could (and even should) commit such a drastic, horrific act. This is something that women are naturally taught to avoid. We silence—ourselves and others. We never annihilate. It’s not in our nature, in our education, or in our environment as women. This is something important to look into. You’re right.
The problem is man-hating feminists like you, that look to blame men for all the ills of the world. Have you spoken up about the female teachers that rape young boys in their classes? I doubt it. Then there are female serial muderers like Dorothea Puente.
Of course you will ignore the fact that this mass shooter belongs to two dangerous demographics at the same time: transsexuals and radical leftists. Then there is the fact that Democrats enable those two demographics. But feminists like you prefer to ignore reality and just blame men.
There are a growing number of women that respect and value men, and speak up about male issues. Those women are always happily coupled. Feminists will grow old alone,
Oh, Joseph.
Couldn't even be bothered to finish your reply there, I see. Less of a mic drop, more of a mic whimper. It happens to everyone, don't worry.
Let's respond to you as if you're not full of shit (but we both know you are):
1. Trans mass shooters are statistical artifacts, not a demographic issue. There’s been only one confirmed trans case of a mass shooter in over six decades of data. That’s not a pattern, that’s a fluke. More robust stats put trans-perpetrator numbers at well under 1% of mass shootings. So you’re either lying, deliberately misreading, or panicking before you read.
2. As for radical leftists being the main mass shooter crew? All the extremist-linked killings in 2022 were far right. Not radical left. And mainstream media agrees: when ideology is in the mix, it’s virtually always the far right calling the shots. But congratulations, you managed to invent a rallying cry out of thin air. Does it hold water? No. But hey, it’s a cry.
3. You assumed facts about me I never even hinted at. I never said I was feminist, leftist, or radical. I don’t owe you my politics. Mass shooters assume facts about their targets too. Maybe you’re more alike than you think.
4. Your what-aboutism doesn't even touch the point, and I know you already know that, because it’s one of the most desperate tools one could use to try and change the subject. You saw that I said there’s a systemic problem and the word “men” and made so many assumptions, that you actually found a way to justify what I said. Ha.
So thanks, Joseph. You’ve managed to prove my point while also proving Phyllis right. A real feminist if I've ever seen one. ✊
I deeply honor your right to be a damn fool and a man-hating feminist. Enjoy life with your cats.
Thanks, enjoy eating garbage off the floor
While some high-profile shootings have involved individuals identifying as transgender, the vast majority of such crimes are committed by people who are not. All are mentally ill.
We are not debating shooting but also the large percentage of transgender who should be properly identified as mentally ill.
The more significant factor to examine is not gender identity but the prevalence of mental illness in American society. Conditions such as gender dysphoria, the correct name for transgender, is often associated with heightened psychological distress and other personality disorders which can contribute to instability, but they are just part of a wider crisis of untreated mental health issues.
Removing the transgender debate from the conversation allows us to focus more directly on the broader problem: the lack of adequate recognition, treatment, and support for serious mental illness.
It is wrong to pump individuals full of hormones to facilitate their delusional identities and this exacerbates a crisis rather than pacifies it.
Agreed.
It's sad that you still need to spell this out.
What's sad is the prevalence of man-hating feminists that blame everything on men, despite the fact that this shooter was both a violent transsexual and a violent leftist radical.
Which is why men have walked away from feminists and feminist-leaning women.
The shooter was a man who think he is a woman and for the umpteenth time, there is a difference between hating men and hating male violence. If you can't tell the difference, it's a good thing that you have walked away from women.
100% agreed!
What about the accompanying hormones being allowed for adolescents who think they (or their parents think they)want to be something other than what they were born as?? Adding extra dynamite 🧨 to the time bomb!
I’m really glad I won’t be living in their adult world . . Really glad!
I find male mass killers want to make a huge statement and inflict maximum, public misery. The rare female mass killer making her statement in the Tennessee school murders was a one-off. Some women and men will kill for greed, passion, revenge, or in the case of child killers (including parental child killers) they are sociopaths that enjoy hurting others. The increasing numbers of school children taking psychiatric meds is a time bomb.
Female mass killers and serial killers do that, too. But feminists like to ignore female criminals,. as it doesn't fit their agenda.
Not all women are false rape accusers. But of the women that make accusations of rape, 40-60% of those accusations are false.